Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3694 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - CA$32.99 vs CA$269.99
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 30% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G1620 - 480 vs 368 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75753 minutes ago
Buy for CA$269.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75753 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
14.954296160877515%
Multi-Core
723
5.897707806509503%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |