Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14500 is 4053 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i5-14500 - CA$32.99 vs CA$329.0
- Up to 86% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-14500 - CA$0.37 vs CA$2.57 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14500
- Performs up to 44% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1620 - 128 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 20 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
89
69.53125%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$32.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 250 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
128
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.57/FPS
14.396887159533076%
Price, CA$
CA$329
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$329 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 250 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
15.982805783509182%
Multi-Core
723
5.446327683615819%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-14500 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |