Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 3585 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600X - CA$36.89 vs CA$289.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing Lost Ark than Ryzen 5 7600X - CA$0.17 vs CA$0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 55 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 40% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G1620 - 310 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
221
71%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13792 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
310
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.93/FPS
18%
Price, CA$
CA$289
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$289 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13792 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |