Buy on Amazon
CA$32.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 1855 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - CA$32.99 vs CA$350.39
- Up to 89% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i7-8700 - CA$0.16 vs CA$1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 18% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G1620 - 239 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
203
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$32.99
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15467 minutes ago
Core i7-8700
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
239
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.47/FPS
10%
Price, CA$
CA$350.39
9%
FPS Winner
Intel BX80684I78700 Boxed 8th Gen Core i7-8700 Processor 3.2 6
Buy for CA$350.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15470 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-8700
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
