Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 1855 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - CA$32.99 vs CA$322.05
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 22% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G1620 - 186 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75672 minutes ago
Buy for CA$322.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75673 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
27.03238598810311%
Multi-Core
723
12.243861134631668%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |