Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700K is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-11700K - CA$36.89 vs CA$463.33
- Up to 90% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i7-11700K - CA$0.3 vs CA$2.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700K
- Performs up to 31% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G1620 - 159 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
121
76%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12643 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
159
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.91/FPS
10%
Price, CA$
CA$463.33
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$463.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12644 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |