Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8600 is 1899 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i5-8600 - CA$36.89 vs CA$254.99
- Up to 84% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Core i5-8600 - CA$0.41 vs CA$2.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600
- Performs up to 13% better in Sons Of The Forest than Celeron G1620 - 102 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 6 vs 2 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
90
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
102
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.5/FPS
16%
Price, CA$
CA$254.99
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$254.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i5-8600 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |