Buy on Amazon
CA$36.89
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $120
Availability
MSRP in USD: $120
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2699 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - CA$36.89 vs CA$265.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Ryzen 3 3300X - CA$0.64 vs CA$3.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 41% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Celeron G1620 - 82 vs 58 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
58
70%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
Ryzen 3 3300X
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
82
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.23/FPS
19%
Price, CA$
CA$265
13%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 4-Core, 8-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler
Buy for CA$265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 3 3300X
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
