Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - CA$36.89 vs CA$330.0
- Up to 87% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-10700K - CA$0.14 vs CA$1.09 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 11% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G1620 - 302 vs 272 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
272
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13944 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
302
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.09/FPS
12%
Price, CA$
CA$330
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$330 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13944 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |