Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3319 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G1610 - 245 vs 229 FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
245
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$113.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$113.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10751 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |