Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3319 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1610 - 124 vs 110 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for CA$113.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
26.57517155333749%
Multi-Core
739
27.41097922848665%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |