Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2407 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 9% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Celeron G1610 - 135 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$133.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75092 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
40.49429657794677%
Multi-Core
739
24.52704945237305%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |