Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 595 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G1610 - 117 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 53 vs 55 Watts
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
73.95833333333334%
Multi-Core
739
75.33129459734964%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |