Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1368 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$120.0 vs CA$142.72
- Up to 14% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$0.48 vs CA$0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Pentium G3250 - 254 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 12 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
251
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6136 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
254
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.56/FPS
85%
Price, CA$
CA$142.72
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$142.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |