Buy on Amazon
CA$111.14
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 41 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD FX-Series FX-8320 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.5 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75077 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
92.81045751633987%
Multi-Core
739
40.62671797691039%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
