Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 3025 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 5% less energy than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 55 vs 58 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 6% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G1610 - 248 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
248
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$121.75
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
50.235849056603776%
Multi-Core
739
41.98863636363636%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6405 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |