Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8350K outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8350K is 1767 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-8350K - 55 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 37% better in Far Cry 6 than Celeron G1610 - 123 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-8350K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
