Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is 2317 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Performs up to 5% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1610 - 333 vs 317 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 15 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
