Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 1897 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 37% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G1610 - 96 vs 70 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
96
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$280
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |