Buy on Amazon
CA$259.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $299
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600X outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600X is 3585 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600X - 55 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
- Performs up to 48% better in Minecraft than Celeron G1610 - 885 vs 598 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD Ryzen™ 5 7600X 6-Core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor, Cooler not Included
Buy for CA$259.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 333 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 5 7600X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
14.879497031086272%
Multi-Core
739
5.770281877098462%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600X |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Celeron G1610 or Ryzen 5 7600X
Minecraft, 1920 x 1080, High
680 FPS
CA$2.5/FPS
GeForce RTX 4060
Ryzen 5 7600X
32 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,699
In Stock
680 FPS
CA$2.41/FPS
GeForce RTX 4060
Ryzen 5 7600X
32 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,635.63
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
