Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 2332 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 16% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Celeron G1610 - 144 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
144
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$360
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$360 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5076 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |