Buy on Amazon
CA$158.07
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $299
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 1963 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 5% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G1610 - 114 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
CPU Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700 R7 2700 3.2 GHz Eight-Core Sixteen-Thread 16M 65W CPU Processor Socket AM4 YD2700BBM88AF
Buy for CA$158.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
38.240574506283664%
Multi-Core
739
13.46329021679723%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
