Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2407 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron G1610 - 254 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$173.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75064 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
37.765957446808514%
Multi-Core
739
20.420005526388504%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |