Buy on Amazon
CA$215.43
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $434
Availability
MSRP in USD: $434
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1275 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1610 - 128 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Intel BX80671I76800K Boxed Core i7-6800K Processor, Gray
Buy for CA$215.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-6800K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
34.80392156862745%
Multi-Core
739
13.054230701289523%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
