Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100 is 4053 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100
- Performs up to 16% better in Valheim than Celeron G1610 - 220 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$159 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 242 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
17.34527687296417%
Multi-Core
739
8.766310794780546%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |