Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 2004 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 46% better in FIFA 23 than FX-8350 - 140 vs 96 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 35% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$182.45 vs CA$280.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$1.9 vs CA$2.0 per FPS
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
140
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2/FPS
95%
Price, CA$
CA$280
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18111 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
96
68%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.9/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18110 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |