Buy on Amazon
CA$290
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $299
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $168
Availability
MSRP in USD: $168
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-8350K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-8350K is 196 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i3-8350K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Ryzen 7 2700 - 202 vs 201 FPS
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$139.99 vs CA$290.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Control than Ryzen 7 2700 - CA$0.69 vs CA$1.44 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
201
99.5049504950495%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.44/FPS
47.916666666666664%
Price, CA$
CA$290
48%
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler - YD2700BBAFBOX
Buy for CA$290 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Core i3-8350K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
202
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.69/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$139.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-8350K 4.0 Ghz Quad-Core LGA 1151 Processor 4.0 4 BX80684I38350K
Buy for CA$139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Core i3-8350K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
|---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
