Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2381 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 2% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than FX-6100 - 215 vs 210 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 31% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$98.43 vs CA$142.72
- Up to 29% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen 5 2600 - CA$0.47 vs CA$0.66 per FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
215
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
71%
Price, CA$
CA$142.72
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$142.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
210
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |