Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2740 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 10% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8320 - 301 vs 274 FPS
- Up to 8% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8320 - CA$0.88 vs CA$0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 0% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - CA$263.71 vs CA$265.0
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
301
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$265
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Buy for CA$263.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |