Buy on Amazon
CA$111.14
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $169
Availability
MSRP in USD: $169
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $249
Availability
MSRP in USD: $249
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X3D is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 63% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - CA$111.14 vs CA$299.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 7 5700X3D - CA$0.58 vs CA$1.4 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-8320 - 213 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
190
89.2018779342723%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$111.14
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-8320 CPU Used 8-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 3.5 GHz 8M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
213
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.4/FPS
41.42857142857142%
Price, CA$
CA$299
37%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D 8-Core, 16-Thread Desktop Processor
Buy for CA$299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen 7 5700X3D
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Not Available |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
