Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 3299 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 32% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8320 - 152 vs 115 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than FX-8320 - CA$223.3 vs CA$307.17
- Up to 45% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8320 - CA$1.47 vs CA$2.67 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for CA$307.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13909 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
152
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$223.3
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$223.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13909 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |