Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2004 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 30% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - CA$264.27 vs CA$375.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 104% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-8320 - 47 vs 23 FPS
- Up to 31% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than FX-8320 - CA$7.98 vs CA$11.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$264.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 34 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
47
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.98/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$375
70%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |