Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2448 days newer than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 23% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-8320 - 133 vs 108 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than FX-8320 - CA$253.39 vs CA$264.27
- Up to 22% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-8320 - CA$1.91 vs CA$2.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$264.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
133
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.91/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$253.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$253.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |