Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700K is 742 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 105 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 7% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 2700X - 182 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - CA$330.0 vs CA$375.0
- Up to 18% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 2700X - CA$1.81 vs CA$2.21 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16403 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.81/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$330
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$330 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16403 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |