Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - CA$189.27 vs CA$358.98
- Up to 26% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-13600K - CA$0.28 vs CA$0.38 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 37% better in Valorant than FX-8320 - 939 vs 684 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
684
72%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$189.27
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$189.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
939
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.38/FPS
73%
Price, CA$
CA$358.98
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$358.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |