Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 31% better in No Man's Sky than FX-8300 - 205 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - CA$83.46 vs CA$358.98
- Up to 70% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-13600K - CA$0.53 vs CA$1.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.75/FPS
30%
Price, CA$
CA$358.98
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$358.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
157
76%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |