Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4690 is 555 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-4690 - CA$83.46 vs CA$109.82
- Up to 19% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-4690 - CA$0.26 vs CA$0.32 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8300 - 341 vs 318 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
318
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18861 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
341
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
81%
Price, CA$
CA$109.82
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$109.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18862 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 84 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |