Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 4003 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than FX-6100 - 194 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - CA$80.8 vs CA$288.97
- Up to 71% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-13600K - CA$0.43 vs CA$1.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
194
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.49/FPS
28.859060402684563%
Price, CA$
CA$288.97
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$288.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49443 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
189
97.42268041237114%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$80.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$80.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49443 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |