Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-875K outperforms the more expensive FX-8320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-875K is 877 days older than the more expensive FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Performs up to 1% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-8320 - 180 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than FX-8320 - CA$112.0 vs CA$264.27
- Up to 58% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-8320 - CA$0.62 vs CA$1.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$264.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Lynnfield |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |