Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 3943 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - CA$112.0 vs CA$209.99
- Up to 31% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-11400 - CA$1.23 vs CA$1.79 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 29% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-875K - 117 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
91
77%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
117
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.79/FPS
68%
Price, CA$
CA$209.99
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |