Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700 is 2410 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i7-7700 - CA$112.0 vs CA$279.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-7700 - CA$0.74 vs CA$1.6 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Performs up to 14% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-875K - 174 vs 152 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
152
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13000 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
174
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.6/FPS
46%
Price, CA$
CA$279
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$279 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13000 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i7-7700 |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |