Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

FX-8320 vs Core i5-14400F

FX-8320 vs Core i5-14400F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-14400F

2.5 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i5-14400F Logo
Intel Core i5-14400F Desktop Processor 10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) up to 4.7 GHz

Buy for CA$324.93 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 63 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-14400F

2.5 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i5-14400F Logo
Intel Core i5-14400F Desktop Processor 10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) up to 4.7 GHz

Buy for CA$324.93 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 63 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.

Advantages of AMD FX-8320

  • Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - CA$239.75 vs CA$324.93
  • Up to 12% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-14400F - CA$2.16 vs CA$2.46 per FPS

Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F

  • Performs up to 19% better in Elden Ring than FX-8320 - 132 vs 111 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
This is a free version of Elden Ring.
Elden Ring

Elden Ring

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

AMD FX-8320 Logo
FX-8320

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


FPS

111

84%

Value, CA$/FPS

CA$2.16/FPS

100%

Price, CA$

CA$239.75

100%

Value Winner

Intel Core i5-14400F Logo
Core i5-14400F

Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024


FPS

132

100%

Value, CA$/FPS

CA$2.46/FPS

87%

Price, CA$

CA$324.93

73%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-14400F Desktop Processor 10 cores (6 P-cores + 4 E-cores) up to 4.7 GHz

Buy for CA$324.93 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 63 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

AMD FX-8320 Logo
FX-8320

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012

Intel Core i5-14400F Logo
Core i5-14400F

Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD FX-8320 Logo
FX-8320

Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012


Single-Core

459

19%

Multi-Core

1819

16%

Intel Core i5-14400F Logo
Core i5-14400F

Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024


Single-Core

2350

100%

Multi-Core

11359

100%

AMD FX-8320 Logo

AMD FX-8320

vs
Intel Core i5-14400F Logo

Intel Core i5-14400F

Oct 23rd, 2012Release Date
Jan 8th, 2024
FXCollectionCore i5
VisheraCodenameRaptor Lake
AMD Socket AM3+SocketIntel Socket 1700
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
8Cores
10
8Threads
16
3.5 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.5 GHz
3.7 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.7 GHz
125 WTDPNot Available
32 nmProcess Size
10 nm
17.5xMultiplier
25.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
Yes
OverclockableNo

Builds Using FX-8320 or Core i5-14400F

Elden Ring, 1920 x 1080, Maximum

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.