Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 1808 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - CA$239.75 vs CA$314.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing Stray than Core i7-8700K - CA$1.36 vs CA$1.7 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 5% better in Stray than FX-8320 - 185 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
176
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.36/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$239.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$239.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.7/FPS
80%
Price, CA$
CA$314
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$314 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |