Buy on Amazon
CA$112
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $353
Availability
MSRP in USD: $353
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $313
Availability
MSRP in USD: $313
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 700 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-875K - 121 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i7-875K - CA$109.99 vs CA$112.0
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core I7-875K I7 875K I7 875 2.933 GHz Used Quad-Core Eight-Thread CPU Processor LGA 1156
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-3770K Quad-Core Processor 3.5 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I73770K
Buy for CA$109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Core i7-3770K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
509
71.99434229137199%
Multi-Core
1761
71.32442284325637%
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
