Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 700 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - CA$112.0 vs CA$214.0
- Up to 44% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-3770K - CA$0.84 vs CA$1.51 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 7% better in War Thunder than Core i7-875K - 142 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
133
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16232 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
142
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.51/FPS
55%
Price, CA$
CA$214
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$214 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16232 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 77 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |