Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 200 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-8150 - 326 vs 318 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - CA$87.12 vs CA$214.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i7-3770K - CA$0.27 vs CA$0.66 per FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
326
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
40%
Price, CA$
CA$214
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$214 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
318
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |