Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 200 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than FX-6100 - 192 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - CA$98.43 vs CA$214.0
- Up to 53% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-3770K - CA$0.52 vs CA$1.11 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
192
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
46%
Price, CA$
CA$214
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$214 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
189
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$98.43
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$98.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |