Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 177 days older than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8300 - 119 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - CA$83.46 vs CA$214.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3770K - CA$0.73 vs CA$1.8 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
119
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.8/FPS
40%
Price, CA$
CA$214
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$214 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
115
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |