Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-14100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-14100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 468 days older than the cheaper Core i3-14100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-14100F - 259 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - CA$159.0 vs CA$369.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-13600K - CA$0.62 vs CA$1.43 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
259
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.43/FPS
43%
Price, CA$
CA$369.99
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$369.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
257
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$159
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$159 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |