Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-11600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 1028 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-11600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11600K - 145 vs 142 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - CA$159.0 vs CA$299.99
- Up to 48% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11600K - CA$1.1 vs CA$2.11 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-14100F - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
145
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.1/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$159
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$159 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Buy for CA$299.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |