Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - CA$111.14 vs CA$289.67
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 34% better in Need For Speed Unbound than FX-8320 - 164 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75689 minutes ago
Buy for CA$289.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75689 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |