Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 4471 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 15% better in Rocket League than FX-8150 - 775 vs 672 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - CA$87.12 vs CA$349.79
- Up to 71% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i5-14400 - CA$0.13 vs CA$0.45 per FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
775
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.45/FPS
28%
Price, CA$
CA$349.79
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$349.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
672
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |