Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 4471 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 127% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-6100 - 512 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - CA$83.57 vs CA$269.0
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$269 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Buy for CA$83.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |